4 ms·

i can only describe the biggest thing missing in very unscientific terms: there is no light, or life, in their eyes. whatever that means.

• coke12 11y ago
  The eyes look dull because they're using very simple rendering techniques. I'd guess that they could make the eyes much more realistic by adding some simple optical effects like specularity or diffraction (http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/~westin/misc/fresnel.jpg http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/~westin/misc/fresnel.jpg). One interesting thing that I noticed at 1:45 is that visible teeth can really change a person's appearance -- Bush doesn't seem to use his teeth at all when he talks.
  • awl130 11y ago
    the pupils, or my perception of the pupils, don't seem to be focusing or moving naturally.
• rzzzt 11y ago
  In some cases, movement of the eyelids when blinking is tracked and reflected in the model, but the texture is not changed to a closed eye quickly enough.
• profinger 11y ago
  That becomes really obvious in people like Daniel Craig who has blue eyes that appear to glow.