You have good point here. The person I choose to believe is the one who talks about radiation balance and p-values and confidence intevals. Then I expect to se

You have good point here. The person I choose to believe is the one who talks about radiation balance and p-values and confidence intevals. Then I expect to see peer revieve publication and some peer revieved confirmation. It's also possible to establish somekind of authority to conduct meta-study. This works nicely in medical field. Someone talking about "99%" of scientists is just distracting. Link the IPCC document and call it a day.