8 ms·
It makes things look more crowded, but unless people are actually using the Comcast WiFi it isn't actually adding to congestion. The periodic SSID beacons are a
by thescriptkiddie 11y ago
It makes things look more crowded, but unless people are actually using the Comcast WiFi it isn't actually adding to congestion. The periodic SSID beacons are an annoyance but they use negligible bandwidth. That said, don't ever use an ISP provided access point.
- pavel_lishin 11y ago> That said, don't ever use an ISP provided access point. Why not?
- 15155 11y agoBecause they're running software you do not control on what is generally sub-par hardware. It's too cheap to get good, enterprise-grade equipment for home usage that will have no problems and allow you to turn all of the knobs.
- WorldMaker 11y agoIn addition to the other answers many of the ISPs provide their hardware on essentially a rental model. The benefit to that is that if you complain loud enough they'll replace it on their dime: the detriment is the same as with any rental though, typically they overcharge you versus what you would pay if you bought it yourself. Your mileage will probably vary, but I've certainly saved money in the long run owning my own equipment, even paying for my own replacements versus storm damage and similar.
- shostack 11y agoAnother consideration is that often they will try to use the fact that you don't use their hardware as an excuse to not go further in troubleshooting since they "don't support 3rd party hardware."
- WorldMaker 11y agoIt's fun when you get the opposite too and they follow their support scripts regardless of your 3rd party hardware and above average knowledge of the subject: Support: On your hardware, do x. Me: Did it already. It reported "Y". Support: Please do it again, following these scripted steps [what don't match my actual hardware]... [I pretend to follow along.] Me: Done. It reported "Y". Support: Oh, well then...
- indlebe 11y ago>That said, don't ever use an ISP provided access point. Because the hardware is often inferior to what you can pick up for ~$200 at a tech store, not to mention the lack of control you get with an ISP AP.
- gst 11y agoRegarding "inferior": It's fast enough and it doesn't crash (at least for me). That's probably "good enough" for most people to not care if there's a better solution. "lack of control": The Comcast provided hardware gives me an IP via DHCP and I'm able to disable all those useless firewall features. So which features am I missing and why should I care about them?
- indlebe 11y agoThe average home user, sure, the ISP AP may be fine. But for the average reader of HN I suspect it would not be. I can't use an AP that does not allow me to fine-tune QoS and just tinker in general if packets are not flowing in the way that I desire.
- untog 11y agoI'd be interested to know how much the average HN user cares about this. I certainly don't. I'm not even entirely sure how fast my home internet connection is - it's certainly fast enough for me to stream Netflix etc as well as connect to a VPN for working from home. I don't really care about anything else. (not that my internet connection is always great - it isn't - but that lies with my internet provider, who I have no choice over, so...)
- jlarocco 11y agoI was going to say this, but you beat me to it. I think there are a lot of smart people on HN, but that doesn't mean they're all interested in all the same things. Tweaking wifi settings just seems like a waste of time to me, and boring to top it off. My interaction with my AP stopped at setting the ssid and passphrase.