4 ms·

yeah right but you could at least try to escape from being hacked by a machete...

• hga 11y ago
  The stark recent example of this was the Rwanda genocide, and there was little or no escape from the crowds wielding machetes. Review videos about the Tueller Drill (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tueller_Drill https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tueller_Drill) and you may become less confident about your ability to try to escape an edged weapon. All this mostly depends on how timely your reaction is to whatever's happening. Once you're a fair distance away, say the 21 foot metric of the Tueller Drill, against a bad marksman you probably have a pretty good chance; the average distance of gun fights as of some years ago was 7 feet.
  • lingua_franca 11y ago
    for fair comparison you need to analyze most common scenario, which is multiple victims/targets vs single killer. it's going be day/night difference between dealing with a guy with a machete in his hand and a gunman...
    • hga 11y ago
      I'm pretty sure the most common scenario is 1 on 1, or 1 on a few you're not willing to abandon, like SO or family, or multiple assailants, a small criminal "gang", on 1 or a few. The lone nutcase assault is very rare in comparison to normal crime. If it's a few on your side you're not willing to abandon, it's entirely another matter and beyond the scope of our discussion. If there's only one target, yourself, then if the one or more assailants are already within "critical distance" I personally don't think the difference between edged weapons and guns is "night and day", but I agree it's still quite big.
    • deleted 11y ago
      [deleted]