5 ms·
I can't justify that kind of outlay. I've managed to strike a decent balance between price and quality - Sennheiser PX 100 [1] for foldable headphones (not suit
by voltagex_ 11y ago
I can't justify that kind of outlay. I've managed to strike a decent balance between price and quality - Sennheiser PX 100 [1] for foldable headphones (not suitable for office use as they leak a lot of sound) or Audiotechnica ANC33is [2] for noise-cancelling & office use
1: http://en-au.sennheiser.com/stereo-headphones-travel-lightweigt-px-100-ii http://en-au.sennheiser.com/stereo-headphones-travel-lightwe...
2: http://eu.audio-technica.com/en/products/product.asp?catID=5&subID=36&prodID=4391 http://eu.audio-technica.com/en/products/product.asp?catID=5...
- golergka 11y agoHow do you define "quality"? Do you automatically assume that sound quality is the most important component of headphone quality, for everyone? Why?
- voltagex_ 11y agoThey're well built, reasonably sturdy (although I've crushed the AudioTechnica ones accidentally) relatively affordable and replacement (parts/products) are available easily. And they sound good.
- golergka 11y agoThanks for that information. But it would be nice if you answered my question. How do you define headphone quality? Do you think that this definition is the same for everyone?
- voltagex_ 11y agoOf course not - that's why I listed some criteria that I use to judge the subjective quality of headphones. If fashion is important to you, you might choose differently.