4 ms·
I don't think it's because you're squeezed for time, but more that you're sense of time has changed. You're probably used to extracting information you want in
by sclangdon 11y ago
I don't think it's because you're squeezed for time, but more that you're sense of time has changed.
You're probably used to extracting information you want in a very short period of time via sites like StackOverflow or Wikipedia or whatever. If you're like me, when you encounter something that isn't going to give you the gold quickly, you probably move on to something that will.
You're used to the quick turnaround, so when something takes longer it makes you feel like you're squeezed for time.
For example, I have plenty of physical programming books. A lot of the time I know that the answer I seek is in one of those books. Sometimes I even know which book and the location in that book. But guess what? I still go to StackOverflow first because it's quicker and someone will have already summarized the book. I'm so used to getting information quickly, that actually having to look for it is unthinkable. It _feels_ like I don't have enough time to read the book myself, but that's really not true at all.
- saranormous 11y agoAgree that everyone's sense of time is changing. I struggle with this - I can't keep myself from speed-reading/skimming longer form text. I do think this is problematic, and not all good. A great deal of knowledge still requires significant length of text to convey -- sure, the retrieval cost for any individual limited concept on the internet is much lower, but you're not going to develop a rich understanding of, as a hyperbolic example, the history of China, from one article or from Wikipedia.