It would not even have to be "atheism," just having the courage to start talking about that the West in fact has what it has because it stopped taking religion

It would not even have to be "atheism," just having the courage to start talking about that the West in fact has what it has because it stopped taking religion too seriously. Which is hard to imagine being said from any influential politician in the US. And there are, as we would see them today, some gory things in the Bible. But not even most extreme international organization of believer fighters tries to "do all what's in the Bible." Not so with the Quran and Surah, only because the doctrine, even promoted by the US "close friends" like Saudi Arabia, is that these "words of God" are to be taken very seriously. And there is really a lot of explicit intolerance in these basic Islamic texts. Which is also unimaginable to be admitted, even if it's true. Humpty-Dumpty politics. And another thing politicians would never say is "OK we'll really stop doing what we're doing, supporting the guys "on our side" no matter what they do." Basically Hillary just hopes "somebody" would invent how to let the big politicians do just what they did up to now, and not lose any sponsor, but to cause change, but only to the taste of them. Win against ISIS but not admit that Libya is much worse since the West did what it did, and Assad is not allowed to stay too, just because "we" don't like him, and that Syria remains "a kind of Libya" "we" don't care too... And "we" will never excuse to anybody for what "we" made of Iraq. Or that "we" actually like those Islamic religious guys making wars because that's always "opportunity" for "us." And when you're there, invent how to make energy out of nothing while keeping the rich rich and the poor poor. And how to eat sugar and fat indefinitely and remain thin. And...