4 ms·
The danger is, I suppose, if they where leveraging any of their content dominance to promote integration between browser and content and therefore lock-in.
by netcan 17y ago
The danger is, I suppose, if they where leveraging any of their content dominance to promote integration between browser and content and therefore lock-in.
- olsonjeffery 17y agoFirefox 3.6 includes "HTML 5" in the list of features, supposedly. Does this include video support? I don't know. I wonder if youtube is restricting browser versions. The idea of vendor lock-in for an open standard (HTML 5) is stupid, though. The reason more browsers aren't on the list, I gather, is that they don't have [adequate] support.