4 ms·
Your point is that you feel queasy about how brutal life was back then and you wanted to throw some shade to feel better about your obviously better moral stand
by saool 11y ago
Your point is that you feel queasy about how brutal life was back then and you wanted to throw some shade to feel better about your obviously better moral standards, and in doing so you missed the shot in the map by thousands of miles.
Here's some reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Legend https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Legend
- pjmlp 11y agoI come from a little place in the Iberian peninsula... As someone that loves to study history, read old mediaeval documents, I know pretty well what our ancestors did.
- saool 11y agoAs do I, and that's why I understand the whole "generational white guilt" spiel, cause I hear it often. Even an educated person such as yourself will be quick to jump the gun. I get it, condemning their actions gives you the higher moral ground, you feel like a mensch and somehow detach you from whatever shared responsibility you think you shoulder. IMHO, we can't judge old-day actions with current-day ethics. The same way we don't generally allow ex post facto law, we should be careful to deliver ex post facto moral judgement. If there's a place for moral relativism, it is probably when comparing different times in history. That is not to say I excuse everything that was done during the colonial times —there are plenty of recollections of senseless atrocities— but there's definitely a tendency to look at all this in a reductionistic and emotional way that I don't think is fair.