It is a compelling argument. However, it doesn't say that there is NOT a problem with having corporations pay to educate the populace about political candidate

It is a compelling argument. However, it doesn't say that there is NOT a problem with having corporations pay to educate the populace about political candidates. Government regulation doesn't seem to be the answer, given this argument. That's fine. But where do the check's and balances on information come from? Google, I suppose.