Author's terminology seems muddled. The first bullet is correct, but only on a technicality, and it fails to point out that strictly there is no "Linux containe

Author's terminology seems muddled. The first bullet is correct, but only on a technicality, and it fails to point out that strictly there is no "Linux container," only an emergent and weakly cohesive combination of features that as an artifact create a so-called Linux container (as opposed to being a well-defined atomic unit/OS resource). The third bullet equivocates archive formats with application containers.