2 ms·

Agreed. I feel like I'm never quite sure where Go falls on this line.

• eikenberry 11y ago
  Where Go falls on this line depends on your conception of a programming language. If you look at a language as static definition that doesn't change with time, it would be easy to see Go as too simple. But looking at a language as an organic thing that grows over time, I think Go's simplicity and resistance to change generally gets it about right. To many modern languages suffer a complexity problem from years of accrued features.