4 ms·
"So the solution is to remove the incentives and opportunities for misbehavior, and raise the risks of exposure. Then, bad actors will adapt and self-select. Ei
by fche 11y ago
"So the solution is to remove the incentives and opportunities for misbehavior, and raise the risks of exposure. Then, bad actors will adapt and self-select. Either they will behave, or they will go elsewhere."
That sounds good, but nothing in the rest of the write-up actually "removes incentives and opportunities" etc. It's the usual sort of "don't harass, don't touch, don't X Y Z ..." litany, without any procedural prescriptions as to what to do in case someone does X.
- PieterH 11y agoThe protocol I describe is almost entirely about procedure. Was that not clear, or not detailed enough? Removing incentive and opportunity means recognizing what creates risk for participants, and reducing that. Which I also did try to cover.
- fche 11y agoOK, there were three bullets in the middle of the "protocol" that dealt with procedure. ("The organizers shall provide as secure ..." through "... privacy of all parties"). But it belabours trivia ("collect time, place, name ...") and skips over substantial questions like burdens of proof, appeals, range of penalties, false complaints, violations of procedure. That's the meat & potatoes of law, amateur or professional.
- PieterH 11y agoYou're right, this part is thin. In terms of penalties, there is only exclusion, or law enforcement. We can expand on the procedural part later.