> What would a satisfactory "why" even look like exactly? As in, what form might it take compared to some other scientific discipline where we do know what's go

> What would a satisfactory "why" even look like exactly? As in, what form might it take compared to some other scientific discipline where we do know what's going on? To me this is obvious: a proof is an adequate answer. All of the explanations given in this area are heuristic reasons. They're nice, but we can't know if they're correct or if we're being fooled by our intuition without a proof.