3 ms·
Sorry, I accidentally upvoted. Your assertion that papers with less errors are more scientific, is not at all true. Plus you are missing the point if you thin
by jpwagner 17y ago
Sorry, I accidentally upvoted.
Your assertion that papers with less errors are more scientific, is not at all true.
Plus you are missing the point if you think counting errors has anything to do with this. Someone has successfully convinced the IPCC that it is RIDICULOUS to claim Himalayan glaciers will be gone in 25 years, and this is a victory for the scientific community.
- lutorm 17y agoI didn't mean they are more "scientific" (whatever that means), I just meant that when you make errors you can come to an erroneous conclusion. If enough studies are incorrect, it will impact the accuracy of the overall conclusion, otherwise you'd hope that most studies are correct.
- jpwagner 17y agoyes, incorrect studies are inaccurate, which is bad. :P