4 ms·
While I don't agree with many of the specifics of the HL7 spec[1], I guess the community behind this project should decide if this system will conform or not.
by guatebus 11y ago
While I don't agree with many of the specifics of the HL7 spec[1], I guess the community behind this project should decide if this system will conform or not.
[1] http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/ http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/
- cmiles74 11y agoIMHO, the HL7 specification isn't particularly strong. Different vendors support different message types, some vendors fill in this field, some another. Most of the work I did with HL7 was making sure System A could read the messages we were passing it from System B by "translating" the HL7 messages. That said, there are open HL7 message "interface engines" and integrating with something like Mirth[0] shouldn't be too difficult. [0] https://www.mirth.com/Products-and-Services/Mirth-Connect https://www.mirth.com/Products-and-Services/Mirth-Connect
- angersock 11y agoHL7 is fucking garbage. The thing is, every client implements a different subset of the spec, and nonconformance is widespread. There is no "conforming" to a spec which is a spec in name only.