First, shootings that happened over four years ago are recent? Second, in at least one case, the weapons were stolen from a parent--so, really, that is kinda a

First, shootings that happened over four years ago are recent? Second, in at least one case, the weapons were stolen from a parent--so, really, that is kinda a dishonest data point if you're trying to argue for legal acquisition of firearms. Third, funny how a good chunk of the shooters here were all veterans. Fourth, and most distressingly: this sort of article really fearmongers about people who have mental illness. In fact, it tends to inch in the direction of saying "Hey, if you see a shrink, for whatever reason, you should be required to forfeit your right to bear arms". This last point is the worst, least of all because it's pretty trivial to abuse.