3 ms·
According to the NYT article: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/03/science/q-carbon-harder-than-diamond.html http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/03/science/q-carbon-har
by nikdaheratik 11y ago
According to the NYT article: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/03/science/q-carbon-harder-than-diamond.html http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/03/science/q-carbon-harder-th... The substence is "magnetic, fluorescent and electroconductive" so likely it's referring to the fluorescent property and it had an electric current running through it during the demo.