I don't see what's so inaccuarate about the headline. He was sued because someone thought the new song sounded similar to his previous song. But the legal syste

I don't see what's so inaccuarate about the headline. He was sued because someone thought the new song sounded similar to his previous song. But the legal system concluded that it was not the same song. I'm having a hard time figuring out how you came to the conclusion that he was not sued for sounding like himself.