3 ms·
A transfer of wealth from the upper class to the lower class is the price we pay for civilization. No welfare to the poor means they have no incentive not to ki
by littletimmy 11y ago
A transfer of wealth from the upper class to the lower class is the price we pay for civilization. No welfare to the poor means they have no incentive not to kill you.
- Nrsolis 11y agoAYFKM? If you kill all the rich people and take their money, who is going to be left to organize businesses or produce the kinds of inventions that benefit society? The "next-richest" people? A society that demonizes its most successful members is a doomed one.
- littletimmy 11y agoInventions can be made through state grants (a lot of innovation is already funded by state grants like NIH). Who told you rich people finance innovation? A society that demonizes its poorest is a doomed one.
- drzaiusapelord 11y ago>state grants like NIH The PhD's, researchers, and managers at Federal organizations make salaries that would classy them as "rich" in this scenario. Just because something is publicly funded doesn't mean its thrifty, efficient, or "for the people." If anything, considering what we know of how governments all over the world work, its more than likely public research and programs are wasteful and corrupt compared to private equivalents.