There is no real explanation for why the article is "bad" except for the tired argument that private foundations imitating the state are good and the state is b

There is no real explanation for why the article is "bad" except for the tired argument that private foundations imitating the state are good and the state is bad. There is no further clarification or explanation; We are supposed to accept this as some sort of given, without pretext or afterthought. Comments like this are bad.