5 ms·

OK; twitter for enterprise, nice UI, not really seeing how you differ from Yammer. Side topic; has anyone succeed long-term with get[name].com? Or do you alway

• ochiba 17y ago
  Hi thafman, thanks for the feedback. This is how we currently aim to differentiate ourselves: * Focused solution: do one thing well. We tried to avoid the urge to include extraneous features. * Very low barriers to adoption. Start with one click. * Simple, intuitive interface. * True real-time, across browsers. * Fast (e.g. no page reloads)
  • apgwoz 17y ago
    Have you discovered yammer doesn't do these things particularly well? I hate to see yet another product become "a better twitter for ____." You'll get more press if you actually solve a real business problem in there. How about making it integrate with ticketing systems, so that it's automatically updated? How about integrating with version control, so that commit messages share the story? Obviously these things are developer focused, but these are the things that get missed in apps like this. Tell me what I'm doing, not the other way around. (obviously I should be able to talk too.)
• patrickmclaren 17y ago
  What about getharvest.com?
• aditya 17y ago
  you succeed enough so you can buy the dot-com name ;-)
• ohashi 17y ago
  I always think getfirefox.com when I need to download it again.