Without evaluating the value of the code itself, the associated copy is nonsensical: "I’m going to spare you the geek-speak and tell you straight up — it’s bas

Without evaluating the value of the code itself, the associated copy is nonsensical: "I’m going to spare you the geek-speak and tell you straight up — it’s basically programming blocks of code that you can use over again." The smallest programming blocks we reuse are called functions, not objects. DRY is a necessary but not sufficient aspect of OO. "So for our purposes, OOCSS is basically a flexible HTML structure..." Why would you give anything composed of HTML a name ending in CSS?