I think most of his talk is wrong. Or at least wrong when we talk about general programming. Go isn't a 'bad' language. Go is simple another tool for one job

I think most of his talk is wrong. Or at least wrong when we talk about general programming. Go isn't a 'bad' language. Go is simple another tool for one job and it's doing his job good, cause of his simplicity. However not every problem is so easy to solve with this simplicity. Some problems doesn't fit well with the Go approach. And I always hate it when people talk about "why x is superior because less/more features", mostly things emerge when the problem emerges.