3 ms·
The assertion was "Obama simply looks presidential", not "sounds" or "acts". I displayed the portraits of ALL PRIOR PRESIDENTS, and NONE OF THEM LOOK LIKE OBAMA
by pius 19y ago
The assertion was "Obama simply looks presidential", not "sounds" or "acts". I displayed the portraits of ALL PRIOR PRESIDENTS, and NONE OF THEM LOOK LIKE OBAMA. Even if that as-perfect-as-humanly-possible disproof was somehow "inadequate", the proof in the first place was completely absent...only a bald declaration.
What on earth are you talking about?
- mynameishere 19y agoIf you click on the "parent" link you can see the prior comments made by myself and others.