3 ms·
While all of what you said might be true... it shouldn't be a felony to hand out flyers telling people what others had decided not to tell them. If the jury has
by jack-r-abbit 11y ago
While all of what you said might be true... it shouldn't be a felony to hand out flyers telling people what others had decided not to tell them. If the jury has a set of rights then they should be made aware of those rights, even the unpopular ones. If people feel strongly enough that a particular jury right should be revoked, then they should pursue steps to revoke it. But they really shouldn't be arresting people for passing out that information.
- tzs 11y ago> If people feel strongly enough that a particular jury right should be revoked, then they should pursue steps to revoke it. It's hard to see how the nullification and anti-nullification powers could be revoked without massively changing the role of the jury. Nullification follows from the double jeopardy rule and the jury not being liable for a "wrong" decision (except in special cases, like a juror selling their vote). Anti-nullification follows from the latter and from judges and appeals courts not having a way to detect anti-nullification.