4 ms·
> It's dumb is what it is. Steady on there. The author has clearly done a lot of work on this and while your points are valid, that this method of attack isn't
by laumars 11y ago
> It's dumb is what it is.
Steady on there. The author has clearly done a lot of work on this and while your points are valid, that this method of attack isn't new nor practical, he has still learned a very genuine potential vector for attack. Thus it deserves a mature discussion since there will certainly be others who might learn from the author's research.
I'm all for constructive criticisms, but calling his article "dumb" is just unnecessary language. It doesn't contribute anything and yet could discourage authors from publishing future work.
- samfpetersen 11y agoSOP for this site: 1. Read content 2. Think of a reason to disparage it 3. Disparage it in a comment 4. Suck own dick
- jessaustin 11y agoOuch it won't reach my mouth; If I could do it myself I'd probably never leave the house.
- pg_is_a_butt 11y agoi'm all for constructive criticisms, but calling his calling of the article "dumb" as "unnecessary language" doesn't contribute anything. your ignorant hypocrisy is dumb.