3 ms·
"Scientific American" is a sad shadow of it's former self. It has gone mass market and PC.It used to be closer to one step below a peer revue scientific journal
by jackfoxy 17y ago
"Scientific American" is a sad shadow of it's former self. It has gone mass market and PC.It used to be closer to one step below a peer revue scientific journal.
- whyenot 17y agoThis is also true for New Scientist, which has really gone down hill over the past few years. The front sections of Science and Nature are pretty good for general science news. Science News might be another option, but I haven't read it in several years and have no idea if it's even still being published.
- rikthevik 17y agoWhat do you guys think of Seed magazine? I've seen the ads for it a million times on ScienceBlogs, but never gotten a subscription.
- arghnoname 17y agoI read "American Scientist," which because of the similar name is confusing, but the content is more rigorous. http://www.americanscientist.org/ http://www.americanscientist.org/ It would be helpful to have some science background in reading it, but most here hopefully have that. I can't vouch for the site itself one way or another, I get it in dead-tree form.