4 ms·

Is _top_ university an important distinction in this context?

• huac 11y ago
  Implication is competition is paramount - both level and quality of output
• Cookingboy 11y ago
  It actually is in my opinion. If the top, elite research institutes show these kind of problem, then we can expect it to be very prevalent in the rest of the field as well. As in, this isn't some no name low tier school run by mediocre people.
  • kuschku 11y ago
    Actually, I’d say it’s the opposite. "Top" "Elite" universities are usually optimized for their metric – which is the Shanghai index, which is based on number of publications in english-language magazines. In countries outside of the Anglosphere often research at universities can go a lot slower, as they have no chance in the Shanghai index anyway. The Fraunhofer institute has, in cooperation with Sony, VW and Mercedes, worked on self driving cars since 2002. Sometimes you just have to throw a few million euro and a few decades onto a project to get some results.
• nextos 11y ago
  It was just to highlight that things are broken even at the top. I've worked all the way from a relatively small institution and I've found little correlation between long term vision and institution ranking, which is quite surprising.