3 ms·
Agreed. I posted saying basically, he was dismissing Google's attachment to good content far too readily - consider YouTube, where they pay royalties per music
by JulianMorrison 17y ago
Agreed. I posted saying basically, he was dismissing Google's attachment to good content far too readily - consider YouTube, where they pay royalties per music playback. Might they do something similar for books?
- dan_the_welder 17y agoSure, crap only wins in the short term and psychologically speaking the last 10 years is nothing in the grand scheme of things. I have a coat older than Google. I have drill press older than the entire internet. I have books that predate the transistor. This is all new and we are just barely coming to terms with a giant sea change in every industry and cultural institution. We need more ideas and techniques to try, old ones, new ones and everything in between.