How is it misstated? That is what he is saying. Not all who believe in evolution is limited to such a reductionist point of view. Just as evolution is an emerg

How is it misstated? That is what he is saying. Not all who believe in evolution is limited to such a reductionist point of view. Just as evolution is an emergent phenomenon that can't be understood by a reduction to physics, I don't think all social phenomenon can be reduced to manifestations of evolutionary forces. That we have sex more for pleasure than for reproduction and that homosexuality is ever more accepted* are simple examples of that. There are many more. - *I wouldn't be surprised if the genes behind homosexuality are more prevalent than before. If true, how would that bake your evolutionist noodle? `