3 ms·
I am not a rocket scientist but I think the horizontal take-off is a huge drawback. * The wings would only be useful at relatively low speeds and then just add
by 7952 11y ago
I am not a rocket scientist but I think the horizontal take-off is a huge drawback.
* The wings would only be useful at relatively low speeds and then just add lots of mass.
* Wings that are efficient at high mach-numbers would be less effective at take-off. Presumably lots of fuel would be burned at low speed to make up for this.
* The structure would need to be strong enough to function whilst horizontal and filled with fuel.
* It would need a large heavy undercarriage capable of supporting the entire take-off weight.
I am unconvinced that horizontal take-off has much benefit anyway. A flight within the atmosphere to a launch site would inevitably use lots of fuel and eliminate any payload capacity. Also, it is hard to believe that anyone is going to allow a massive hydrogen fuel tank to fly over populated areas.
A more traditional single stage to orbit would make more sense IMHO.
- Gravityloss 11y agoOn the other hand if you can use existing runways for ferrying the Skylon around, it can give a lot of operational flexibility. You do still need hydrogen etc, but maybe you can bring that in with a normal jetliner.