3 ms·
Doesn't that redundancy kinda suggest that there are two orthogonal things going on here? ie, block | inline --------- flex | inline-flex What
by jewbacca 11y ago
Doesn't that redundancy kinda suggest that there are two orthogonal things going on here?
ie,
block | inline
---------
flex | inline-flex
What could you label the axes here? Or is this not a valid way to frame the relationship between these things?
- talmand 11y agoI'm not sure I understand what it is your asking. I'm guessing maybe I can say flex = block and inline-flex = inline-block? Except that the flex properties also affect its immediate children.
- DiThi 11y agoinline and inline-block are not the same thing. inline-flex behaves like inline-block
- jewbacca 11y agoBrainfart. You're right, thank you.