3 ms·
If any of the developers see this thread, does this new linker fix the issue of circular library dependencies requiring that a given library be specified multip
by jbandela1 11y ago
If any of the developers see this thread, does this new linker fix the issue of circular library dependencies requiring that a given library be specified multiple times? Also, can we get rid of the dependency on the order libraries are specified? IMO order of the libraries should not matter, just that they are all listed.
- rui314 11y agoIf you are talking about archive files (.a files), then the answer is yes. lld is not sensitive to the order of archive files in the command line. For any undefined symbol, if there exists a file that defined the symbol, the file gets linked no matter how files are ordered.