4 ms·
The main benefit I receive from publishers is filtering. Even the worst publisher printing unbelievable shlock is light years ahead of the garbage in the publis
by msg 17y ago
The main benefit I receive from publishers is filtering. Even the worst publisher printing unbelievable shlock is light years ahead of the garbage in the publishing anteroom, the slush pile.
With that, the greatest blog post on publishing of all time, "Slushkiller":
http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/004641.html http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/004641.html
- tjic 17y ago> The main benefit I receive from publishers is filtering. The main benefit I receive from my friends is filtering. Now, the question is: do publishers or my friends do that job better?
- msg 17y agoOr a deeper question, are the publishers making your friends' lives easier by doing it first? Do your friends read thousands of self-published books to provide you with recommendations? Or is all their action applied after the mainstream publishers' filter? I'm sure there is self-published stuff out there that is worth my time. Unfortunately, I don't want to read the literary equivalent of MySpace to find it. A good publisher has a quality bar I can trust, and they've taken on the burden of reading unsolicited submissions. And as the blog post says, 75% of it is unreadable crap, 24% is readable but not worth your time, and 1% or less is quality and publishable. That's a lot of hours you and your friends would have wasted.
- andrewcooke 17y agothat's true for me (using publishers as filters) when i'm in a bookstore. but i don't think i've looked at who the publisher of a book is when buying from amazon for ages - typically i read amazon's comments and then google around for what other people are saying.