3 ms·
This was published in JACM Volume 12, 1965: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=321264.321274 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=321264.321274. So for it to b
by poizan42 11y ago
This was published in JACM Volume 12, 1965: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=321264.321274 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=321264.321274. So for it to be unclassified it would have to somehow have been classified after being publicy published.
- dang 11y agoThanks, I was hoping someone would find the actual date, which we've now added to the title. (Originally it said "Unclassified 2011".)
- jamessb 11y agoI think you are confusing 'unclassified' and 'declassified': declassified means that it was previously (but no longer) classified; unclassified means that it is not classified. If this had been classified then declassified it would have the original marker (but crossed out), and the text at the bottom would be "Declassified and Approved for Release", rather than just "Approved for Release". For an example of this, see https://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/cryptologs/cryptolog_01.pdf https://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/cryptologs/cryptolog_...
- poizan42 11y agoYeah, I think I (as well as other users) got confused by it being "unclassified in 2011" as the title said previously.