4 ms·
The enemy is ambiguity. To avoid ambiguity, you need to be explicit. Being explicit is expensive. Thought prediction (auto-completion) is the solution. We need
by miguelrochefort 11y ago
The enemy is ambiguity. To avoid ambiguity, you need to be explicit. Being explicit is expensive. Thought prediction (auto-completion) is the solution.
We need a computer-assisted predicate-oriented language. This will become the only UI we need.
- will_pseudonym 11y agoI have been wanting to build this for years. We should chat!
- miguelrochefort 11y agoMy very existence is defined by this vision. Let's talk.
- will_pseudonym 11y agoMy email address is willhinsa at google's email service. Yours?
- vinceguidry 11y agoHow is this better than hooking into bash-completion? I don't see this avoiding ambiguity.
- miguelrochefort 11y ago- Text isn't sufficient to a rich interface. - Auto-completion is best when you start with arguments (as opposed to a function or predicate).
- aniro 11y ago>>The enemy is ambiguity. To avoid ambiguity, you need to be explicit. Being explicit is expensive. Beautifully succinct and widely applicable. It is a gem, thank you.
- Zardoz84 11y ago> Thought prediction (auto-completion) is the solution. Use fish shell