2 ms·
The biggest thing that would help rein in costs would be the elimination of all the "free money," i.e. loans, that students can get to pay those costs. If stud
by erbo 11y ago
The biggest thing that would help rein in costs would be the elimination of all the "free money," i.e. loans, that students can get to pay those costs. If students can't pay those costs, they won't. Universities will either then reduce their costs, or go bankrupt and be replaced by institutions that will.
This could be accomplished with a couple of changes to current policy. First, remove the restriction that makes student loans nondischargeable in bankruptcy. Second, get the Federal government out of the business of providing student loans. With these changes, private institutions will only lend money for education if they have a reasonable expectation that the money will be paid back. That'll dry up the "free money" spigots.
Back in the 1960's, it was possible for a student to pay for his education by flipping pizzas at night and over the summer, without having to take out loans. That's the standard we should be shooting for.
- VLM 11y agoIt'll likely be part of a cross generational compromise. So due to educational debt the kids can't buy their ancestors overpriced real estate or pay SS taxes sufficient to keep SS afloat. The solution is government education loan jubilee day paired with an increase in SS taxes such that the kids end up paying as much as before, but now their balance sheet is more mortgage positive. Meanwhile the old people keep running the SS ponzi for a couple more years.