4 ms·
As to your first point: I agree with you, both redistribution of wealth and regulating companies can be very good (even necessary) things. Acting on climate ch
by draaglom 11y ago
As to your first point: I agree with you, both redistribution of wealth and regulating companies can be very good (even necessary) things.
Acting on climate change is one of those necessary things.
W.r.t the OP though: anecdotally the point sometimes does seem to be to take their income away - I've met many people who appear to have chosen their position on climate change because it happened to be the anti-establishment one.
- chaz72 11y agoWell, at the time the OP mentioned it, I had never heard of people choosing a position on climate change just because of who would get hurt by the process of addressing it. I still have never heard an example, and I've certainly never spoken to such a person. I'm not disputing your experience. Some people are just contrary.