> It's just my hypothesis about some code being more important than other that is inconclusive. There's a lot of literature going back a long way showing that

> It's just my hypothesis about some code being more important than other that is inconclusive. There's a lot of literature going back a long way showing that defects tend to cluster. A leading indicator might be defects found in a module divided by coverage volume. On the other hand, defects tend to cluster in the hard stuff, not at random.