3 ms·
Yeah, that would definitely take the bloom off the rose for me as well. I'm already wishing I had some of the things Android has and Apple doesn't (interpreter
by olefoo 17y ago
Yeah, that would definitely take the bloom off the rose for me as well.
I'm already wishing I had some of the things Android has and Apple doesn't (interpreters FTW) but I would jump if they tried to steer me towards 'favored partners' for search.
- thafman 17y agoBut they already have 'favored partners' for search (Goog and Yhoo) you can't add another search provider even if you want to.
- DenisM 17y agoThey already steer you towards google.
- metachor 17y agoYep. I don't understand why people assume Google is some sort of neutral party with no corporate interest in vending their search engine + ad sales in the marketplace.
- axod 17y agoI don't think that is a concern for most people. The major concern is 'does it work'. Google has far better results, especially for the long tail, than bing at the moment. It's also what most people 'know'.
- evgen 17y agoWhile the claim that google has better results is rather questionable, the suggestion that bing is too complicated for people to use is just silly. For the purposes of most users the two are readily interchangeable. You are correct that the major concern is "does it work", but are incorrect in assuming that bing does not meet this rather low bar.
- DenisM 17y agoBy which measure is Bing inferior to Google? Other than what you 'know'.