3 ms·
This somewhat makes my point, it is the type of comment that shows up every time somebody mentions testing but nobody has ever thought that coverage alone is a
by daleharvey 11y ago
This somewhat makes my point, it is the type of comment that shows up every time somebody mentions testing but nobody has ever thought that coverage alone is a good guarantee of test quality, it is however very obviously a useful metric.
- lmm 11y ago> nobody has ever thought that coverage alone is a good guarantee of test quality Wrong. I could name three managers who have from personal experience. > it is however very obviously a useful metric. Disagree. I think it's an actively counterproductive metric, and one is better off not measuring it at all.