4 ms·
Whatsapp playing low, really low. (Can't click/copy Telegram URL's)
- rplnt 11y agoAnother discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/3uubzr/whatsapp_playing_low_really_low_cant_clickcopy/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/3uubzr/whatsapp_pl...
- it_learnses 11y agoinstalling telegram now! might delete whatsapp :)
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- viewer5 11y agoNo reddit at work; what's going on?
- toufka 11y agoHere's the imgur[1] link. It appears to show contextual formatting of http links from within Whatsapp - when you text someone 'https://google.com' https://google.com' it formats it as a clickable link, and not just text. However, the same formatting is not applied to 'http://telegram.me' http://telegram.me' or 'http://telegram.org' http://telegram.org' links. [1] https://i.imgur.com/B5ISWZw.jpg https://i.imgur.com/B5ISWZw.jpg
- titomc 11y agoNo wonder Facebook paid that amount, the plot thickens. https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/366h46/starting_to_see_facebook_friend_suggestions_which/ https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/366h46/starting_to...
- CM30 11y agoIt's disappointing, but to be honest, not all that unexpected. A company blocking links to competitors on their service is pretty common, even in the world of social media and instant messaging. Which raises an interesting point with these services. At what point is it 'wrong' for a company to control what people can link to on their service? This example is pretty tame given it's merely not being linked, but if the link had been removed altogether, would that be 'unethical'?