3 ms·
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Known-plaintext_attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Known-plaintext_attack
by mulle_nat 11y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Known-plaintext_attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Known-plaintext_attack
- hodwik 11y agoCare to explain the relevance?
- stickac 11y agoWhen you have an encrypted file (or a stream for that matter) and you know the first N bytes of the decrypted data, it might be easier to compute the encryption key if algorithm uses blocks smaller than N.
- pilsetnieks 11y agoThe relevance is that this text could ostensibly be used as the known plaintext to aid in breaking encryption, however, it's not going help much anyway. For example, with HTTP 1.1, it is pretty much likely that an HTTP response would start with HTTP/1.1 200 OK, or that it would contain strings such as "Content-Type" or "Content-Length". 24 more known bytes won't make it much worse.
- admax88q 11y agoAny strong cipher should be resistant to a known plaintext attack. If your encryption is vulnerable to known plaintext you should upgrade.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- tptacek 11y agoThat's extraordinarily silly, because HTTP is already loaded up with much more useful runs of known plaintext.