3 ms·
I might go so far as making the platform invitation only. I think doing so would provide two benefits. First, it would allow you to generally restrict the userb
by fvargas 11y ago
I might go so far as making the platform invitation only. I think doing so would provide two benefits. First, it would allow you to generally restrict the userbase to the type of person for whom it's intended. Second, it provides a sort of crowdsourced verification that I think would help people feel like they're part of a trustworthy community.
This is perhaps comparable to private torrent trackers that are invitation only. Though in this case, there wouldn't be a strong incentive to abuse that system. Another example is the invitation-only system with which the OnePlus One launched (and still uses to a degree). The One started off as a "flagship killer" geared toward tech-savvy people, specifically the kind of people who would not buy an iPhone. Like with many "exclusive" products, people became interested. The simple fact that you could have offices at large tech companies with mailing lists with the sole purpose of distributing free invitations is not only excellent advertisement, but it demonstrates how making a product/platform/service exclusive can have substantial benefits when geared toward the right group of people.
- captn3m0 11y agoThe barrier to entry is already high for many people. Filing a PR is sufficiently easy, but you also need a GitHub account for the same. I launched HackerCouch at hackbeach this year, and the first few people on there are friends who I know personally, so it was kinda invite-only to start with. But I don't want HC to become the one-stop couchsurfing website for everyone. I want it to be a cool way to find like-minded people where you are travelling.