3 ms·
The 6 billion is the original number. The real number is 15 billion + X with X largely unknown. That was my whole point: I find a project that is so dishonest a
by hannob 11y ago
The 6 billion is the original number. The real number is 15 billion + X with X largely unknown. That was my whole point: I find a project that is so dishonest about its real cost not trustworthy.
Whether you consider that worth the price will largely depend on whether you believe it's game-changing. I don't.
- jacquesm 11y agoIt will be game-changing at any price, the first problem is to find a solution that works sustainable at the scales we are looking for, then we can look at the economics. I agree that that is the harder problem but I'd be more than happy if ITER or any other fusion project would get to > 1.