3 ms·
i3 is really nice, it looks good with the useless-gaps patch too. But it hardly has the most amount of visual customization, rather the contrary IMO. awesomewm,
by PeCaN 11y ago
i3 is really nice, it looks good with the useless-gaps patch too. But it hardly has the most amount of visual customization, rather the contrary IMO. awesomewm, herbstluftwm, and others offer way more to tinker with. Its manual tiling and modal keybindings is what makes it nice IMO.
Recently I switched from i3 to bspwm, I really love the approach bspwm takes. Definitely the best designed window manager I've used.
- pmoriarty 11y agoWhat advantage does bspwm have over i3?
- Nauxuron 11y agoCommand driven configuration. Everything is scriptable. It also uses a binary tree structure for managing splits, and I found out that I liked that more than the way i3 does it.
- PeCaN 11y agoUsing a binary tree to partition splits is really convenient. It gives you all the manual control of i3 but the default layout is what you want most of the time. Also it's much more configurable and has useless gaps by default (personal preference).
- fivre 11y agoLooks a lot like the tiling modes I used most often in awesomewm, which I eventually ditched for i3 because the constantly-shifting configuration files were a pain to maintain and broke an extension (shifty) that i3 more-or-less includes by default. I definitely missed the different auto-tiling algorithms in awesomewm, but I've gotten pretty used to manually tiling everything.