8 ms·
"you endorse a behavior that is in and of itself toxic -- publicly crucifying somebody because you don't agree with their beliefs... it's downright disgusting."
by bfg 11y ago
"you endorse a behavior that is in and of itself toxic -- publicly crucifying somebody because you don't agree with their beliefs... it's downright disgusting."
Lol, didn't take you long to become a hypocrite on that one!
But seriously, "someone" and "CEO of a major corporation that relies on its good image" are different things. We rightly hold them to different standards. Holding unpopular (and exclusionary) political beliefs is incompatible with leading a company like Mozilla.
- yarou 11y agoI disagree sempai. Holding a CEO to a different standard than a common employee is a recipe for elitism. I will reiterate that a person's beliefs have no bearing on their ability.
- bfg 11y agoYou hold CEOs to a different standard because they are the public face of an organization; their personal brand impacts the brand of the company. That's not elitism, that's common sense. If a common employee holds some unpopular opinion, why should anyone care? But if the CEO does, it damages the company, and the company should care about that.
- Frondo 11y agoWell, and go one further: if a common employee does hold an unpopular opinion and they publicize it widely, think how long they'll last at the company anyway. Take a totally fictional example, a product manager at Intel who, on the weekends, has been leading neo-nazi marches and getting on the news. The reporters ask him, "what do you do to pay for all these flags and banners and tattoos?" "Oh, I work at Intel during the week. I'm a product manager in the networking hardware division." Think how many weekends they'd give out that interview answer before Intel let them go for whatever reason.