> It still sounds inflammatory to me It rally wasn't meant to be. The article in question was very good, I thought, except for its needlessly inflammatory ref

> It still sounds inflammatory to me It rally wasn't meant to be. The article in question was very good, I thought, except for its needlessly inflammatory reference to something which still gets emotions high (for no particularly good reason, since the facts are easily available, but that's neither here nor there). Articles like this would be much more persuasive if they stuck to the (incredibly important) facts, and didn't engage in fantasies, stoking the fires of needless dissent as they do so.