> the Wikipedia figure gives a pretty real sense of scale in my opinion. As noted below, Wikipedia raises that amount because that's what they need. They could

> the Wikipedia figure gives a pretty real sense of scale in my opinion. As noted below, Wikipedia raises that amount because that's what they need. They could easily raise more if they wanted or needed to. Mozilla already does have a donation drive; the question we're discussing is whether it would be beneficial (and practical) for Firefox to shift its business model to rely more heavily on user donations. Currently, Mozilla does not raise more because they don't need to - it's not their primary source of funding, and so they're not as aggressive with their donation campaign as they could be.